Are We Getting Closer To Finding Rachel Morin's Killer?

Rachel Morin's murder has sent shockwaves throughout the community, as investigators scramble to connect the dots between her death and a seemingly unrelated crime in Los Angeles. On the latest episode of "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski discussed these chilling developments with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program.
 
 The intriguing DNA connection lies at the heart of the investigation. "The DNA profile sample from a crime scene in Bell Air Trail, where Rachel Morin was found dead this month matched to a person wanted in Los Angeles in connection with a burglary and a sexual assault," explained Brueski.
 
 Dreeke emphasized that having DNA isn't a guaranteed route to a quick arrest. "I've spoken about this one quite a few times. DNA's good if there's other DNA to match it to. So just because you have DNA doesn't mean it's gonna be a hit." Dreeke discussed the 'CSI effect,' where people assume that any DNA evidence instantly solves a crime. In reality, DNA matches depend on having a database to compare it to. And the surprising connection of this DNA to a crime in Los Angeles reveals challenges of its own. "I am actually dumbfounded that they got DNA from the LA case into the Dakota system because that's a massive backlog," Dreeke noted.
 
 Brueski pointed out that video footage showed the suspect in Los Angeles leaving an apartment without appearing to rush. "He was kind of moving with a purpose," observed Brueski. Dreeke speculated, based on this, that there was more information to uncover about the suspect. "My conjecture is that there's gonna be a digital footprint they're looking at," he posited.
 
 In fact, Rachel Morin's recent activities could provide a clue. "Rachel Morin, you know, she had just told her coworkers how she's on five dating websites," said Dreeke, suggesting that she might have had a digital footprint that made her a target. If this is true, there's a possibility the LA victim might have been in contact with the same individual through online platforms.
 
 When asked about the probability of the murder being random, Dreeke mentioned that while every case is unique, statistics usually indicate that it's not random. He said, "In most of these cases, the individual is known by the assailant. The guy that killed her most likely was aware of her."
 
 A standout point in the discussion was the possibility that the suspect might have committed other crimes between March and now. "There is most likely a path of destruction in between the two. When we look at people that conduct sexual assaults and physical assaults in this way, they just don't stop. It's a path of destruction," Dreeke emphasized.
 
 Brueski touched on the nature of the Los Angeles assault, speculating based on the assailant's calm exit that the victim might have known him, or that there might be a relational context to the crime. "Hopefully the relationship that there was is at least how they found each other online. Because that will give them a digital footprint," Dreeke interjected, reinforcing the digital footprint angle of the investigation.
 
 In summing up, Dreeke maintained hope for the investigators, "If the investigators are lucky, he was carrying a cell phone with him when he assaulted the woman out in LA, and he's got another cell phone with him when he murdered Rachel. That's going to give us an overlap there as well."
 
 Brueski concurred, concluding, "There's DNA, but it's another thing too when we add in that digital footprint if they find him and what they find on that could be even more damning than just the DNA itself."
 
 As authorities continue their relentless pursuit of justice for Rachel Morin and the Los Angeles victim, the blend of traditional forensic evidence and the modern digital footprint could be the key to cracking this horrifying case.
Want to