- After-Shows
- Alternative
- Animals
- Animation
- Arts
- Astronomy
- Automotive
- Aviation
- Baseball
- Basketball
- Beauty
- Books
- Buddhism
- Business
- Careers
- Chemistry
- Christianity
- Climate
- Comedy
- Commentary
- Courses
- Crafts
- Cricket
- Cryptocurrency
- Culture
- Daily
- Design
- Documentary
- Drama
- Earth
- Education
- Entertainment
- Entrepreneurship
- Family
- Fantasy
- Fashion
- Fiction
- Film
- Fitness
- Food
- Football
- Games
- Garden
- Golf
- Government
- Health
- Hinduism
- History
- Hobbies
- Hockey
- Home
- How-To
- Improv
- Interviews
- Investing
- Islam
- Journals
- Judaism
- Kids
- Language
- Learning
- Leisure
- Life
- Management
- Manga
- Marketing
- Mathematics
- Medicine
- Mental
- Music
- Natural
- Nature
- News
- Non-Profit
- Nutrition
- Parenting
- Performing
- Personal
- Pets
- Philosophy
- Physics
- Places
- Politics
- Relationships
- Religion
- Reviews
- Role-Playing
- Rugby
- Running
- Science
- Self-Improvement
- Sexuality
- Soccer
- Social
- Society
- Spirituality
- Sports
- Stand-Up
- Stories
- Swimming
- TV
- Tabletop
- Technology
- Tennis
- Travel
- True Crime
- Episode-Games
- Visual
- Volleyball
- Weather
- Wilderness
- Wrestling
- Other
If the conditions aren't perfect to Co-design, is it better to not Co-design at all?
In this episode, Tracey and Dan debate the topic, that if the conditions for co-design aren't perfect, whether you should do it or not.<br/><br/>Here is a taste of what Tracey and Dan cover in the conversation: Thoughts on why you should or shouldn't co-design even if its not perfectWhat is the agreed definition of co-design?Do you have to follow the whole co-design process or can you use elements?Can you only co-design if you are a certified and experienced facilitator? What if you can't access the most vulnerable people in the community?When shouldn't you co-design?Links from the episode:The Innovate For Impact self assessment: Click hereThe Impacto Consulting website: Click hereImpacto Consulting on LinkedIn: Click here